Skip to content

Infimum: the greatest lower bound

Textbook

The nonempty real set $T$ is bounded below. Its infimum $m=\inf T$ satisfies $m\le t$ for every $t\in T$, and every other lower bound is at most $m$. It is the greatest lower bound.

Equivalently, for every $\varepsilon>0$ some $t\in T$ satisfies $m\le t<m+\varepsilon$. Values can approach arbitrarily closely from above; $m$ need not belong to $T$. Completeness of the real numbers ensures an infimum exists for a nonempty set bounded below.

For a function, $\inf_{x\in S}f(x)$ applies this definition to its range. For $f(x)=x$ on $(0,1)$, the infimum is 0. Zero bounds all values below, while every positive candidate fails: some smaller positive value remains in the interval.

If the infimum is attained at an admissible input, it is a minimum. Zero is excluded from this open interval, so no minimum exists. Without a lower bound, no finite real infimum exists; writing $-\infty$ uses an extended-real convention.

The approximation condition identifies the greatest lower bound. If a larger lower bound $b$ existed, the choice $\varepsilon=b-m$ applies. The definition would then produce an element $t<b$, contradicting the lower-bound property of $b$. Merely showing that every element exceeds the candidate is insufficient: every smaller number would pass that weaker test as well.

Definitions and notation: Basic Analysis I.

Related concepts: A function’s minimum: the smallest attained value.

In plain language

An infimum resembles the highest floor that still fits below every value. A lower floor is possible, but any upward shift violates the condition for some value. For $(0,1)$ the floor sits at zero even though no number stands on it. An unoccupied floor does not imply a shared positive gap; values may approach the boundary arbitrarily closely.

Example

The constructed set is $(0,1)$. The example tests lower-bound candidates and approaches zero.

Infimum: the greatest lower bound

A loose lower bound

Minus one is below all values, but zero gives a higher lower bound.

Step 1 of 4: A loose lower bound

Read all steps
  1. A loose lower bound

    Minus one is below all values, but zero gives a higher lower bound.

    Candidates
    −10current
  2. An invalid higher bound

    Candidate 0.1 fails because admissible value 0.05 is smaller.

    Candidate; counterexample
    0.1excluded0.05included
  3. Approaching from above

    Positive values 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 remain in the set and approach zero.

    Admissible values
    0.10.01current0.001included
  4. The bound is unattained

    Zero is the exact lower bound but is excluded from the set.

    Infimum; membership
    0included0 ∉ (0,1)excluded

For any positive candidate $b$, an interval element lies below it: the choice $t=\min(b/2,1/2)$ gives a number that is positive, below 1, and below $b$. One construction of a counterexample thus replaces an endless inspection of decimal samples. Using the same construction for accuracy $\varepsilon$ gives an element between zero and $\varepsilon$. None of these steps declares zero an admissible element of the interval.

An infimum must be a lower bound that cannot be raised. Attainment is a separate check.

The original text of this free article is published under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Previous / next

Previous
Argmax: the set of maximizing inputs
Next
Supremum: the least upper bound
  • Natural Numbers: Counting Discrete Objects

    Which values count discrete objects, and why the zero convention must be stated.

    Read article
    Math
  • Integers: Counting on Both Sides of Zero

    Positive and negative integers, zero, and the limits of integer division.

    Read article
    Math
  • Rational Numbers: Ratios of Integers

    Numbers as ratios of integers: equivalent fractions and the nonzero denominator requirement.

    Read article
    Math